Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

Is a 100 'greatest albums of all time' really such a good idea?

funkycow [Edit] [Delete] 15:06, 20 April '15

ESA raised this in a round about way with the OK Computer thread, so this is a follow on from that.

In countering the thinly veiled's view that I should be letting my young children listen to 'the classics' as well as the stuff I listen to on a day to day basis (mostly in the car), I've been buying up the odd 'classic' here and there. An obvious examples is Pet Sounds. This appears to be uniformly acknowledged as a Top 10 album of all time, but at least half of it is gloomy dreck interspersed with the cheerful beach tunes we know and love.

I would imagine a lot of 'classics' from the past are awarded their status based on how ground breaking they were at the time (song writing, production, cultural context) whereas it is harder to stand out now.

In that context, IS it ok for records like OK Computer to be considered as in the top (say) 10 of all time?

TL;DR


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND