Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

This 'three strikes' thing that the BPI are pushing for

dove_from_above [Edit] [Delete] 11:50, 6 March '08

It's unworkable, surely?

Have there been any good threads on it lately? I'm interested in hearing what people think about it. Whilst I understand that people should ultimately pay for music, I'm also of the (probably quite immature) opinion that the music 'industry' as a whole has operating within a warped marketplace for far too long, and are in some way slightly deserving of this huge kick up the arse

Clearly, artists losing out is A Bad Thing. But how many other areas of commerce have been operating within a fixed and undisputed price structure for over 20 years? And how is it right that the BPI can adopt these bully tactics and hold any sway over governmental action when it's effectively just working as a bitch for the majors?

I may have asked this before, but does anybody know of any stats that give an idea either way as to the effect downloading is actually having on the music industry?


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND