am i alone in finding the primary coverage bizzare. for instance, its been proclaimed everywhere that clinton won in nevada, and she did, in terms of votes. but its hardly a crucial victory as has been suggested, sine obama actually gained more delegates from the state, because of the way the voting works.

i'm just bemused by it all. is it just a case of the news wanting to be able to see 'x wins crucial victory' rather than 'oh, it was a bit of both'?